home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0780>
- <title>
- Jun. 13, 1994: Books:Tale of a Sacrifical Llama
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Jun. 13, 1994 Korean Conflict
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ARTS & MEDIA/BOOKS, Page 75
- Tale of a Sacrifical Llama
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> In a bittersweet memoir, Mario Vargas Llosa recalls his early
- life and his quixotic campaign for the presidency of Peru
- </p>
- <p>By Paul Gray
- </p>
- <p> To those of us who knew his work, Mario Vargas Llosa's campaign
- in the late 1980s for the presidency of his native Peru seemed
- to be a quixotic enterprise. Here was the acclaimed author of
- such works as The Time of the Hero and Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter
- immersing himself in the rococo poltics of a country embattled
- by stratospheric inflation, pervasive corruption, severe ethnic
- tensions and a murderous band of Maoists known as the Shining
- Path. Most of Vargas Llosa's readers sighed happily when he
- finally lost in June 1990 to Alberto Fujimori.
- </p>
- <p> Understandably, the author does not entirely share this sense
- of relief. A Fish in the Water (Farrar Straus Giroux; 532 pages;
- $25) is his bittersweet look at the nearly three years he spent
- in public life. It all came about, he says, "through the caprice
- of the wheel of fortune." At the time, he thought of his decision
- to campaign for the presidency as a "moral" one. "Circumstances,"
- he writes, "placed me in a position of leadership at a critical
- moment in the life of my country." But that's what all politicians
- say. Vargas Llosa the writer is now willing to dig a bit deeper
- into his reasoning. "If the decadence, the impoverishment, the
- terrorism, and the multiple crises of Peruvian society had not
- made it an almost impossible challenge to govern such a country,
- it would never have entered my head to accept such a task."
- Could any motivation be more quixotic than that?
- </p>
- <p> Vargas Llosa intersperses his account of his public life with
- chapters about his childhood and youth, beginning with a vivid
- and traumatic memory. One day when he was 10 years old, his
- mother revealed to him that his father had not died before little
- Mario was born, as he had always been told, but was alive and
- was waiting in a nearby hotel to meet his son for the first
- time. The boy was not amused. The reasppearance of Ernesto J.
- Vargas, who had abandoned his wife a few months into her pregnancy,
- meant that Mario was yanked out of his mother's loving, extended
- family, the Llosas, and forced to live in close quarters with
- an extremely irritable stranger.
- </p>
- <p> In fiction, the cruelties experienced in childhood might be
- used to explain the adult who survived them, but Vargas Llosa
- does not attempt to make such connections here. The sections
- on the campaign and those on his youth run along parallel tracks,
- and the story of his early life trails off after he graduates
- from college and decides to go to Europe and write. Both stories
- have a matter-of-fact air about them that suggests the author
- is more inerested in remembering his past than in interpreting
- it.
- </p>
- <p> In the political chapters, this tendency can lead to some pretty
- humdrum passages: "We held the first Freedom Day in the Hotel
- Crillon, in Lima, on Feburary, 6, 1988; the second, devoted
- to agrarian subjects, at the San Jose hacienca in Chincha on
- February 18; on February 26, in Arequipa..." For most readers,
- such moments will probably demand a greater interest in Peruvian
- affairs than can fairly be expected.
- </p>
- <p> Still, the campaign memoir offers a convincing self-portrait
- of a polticial innocent sinking under a tide of democratic absurdities.
- Wildly popular at first, Vargas Llosa presented a coherent but
- harsh economic plan to his fellow citizens and rapidly became
- Peru's sacrifical llmama; toward the end of the campaign he
- endured catcalls, stone throwing and scurrilous allegations
- about nearly everything, including his books. "Peruvians did
- not vote for ideas in the elections," the author writes with
- considerable understatement. The moral of this often funny cautionary
- tale is that you should mix politics and novel writing only
- if you are Benjamin Disraeli.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-